Monday's tape is toppy — RSP flat against the 100-day, breadth narrowing, and the old leaders are stalled. But the trade is still on: leaders trade at new highs because they are strong, not because they are expensive. Cheap stocks are cheap for a reason. Matt executed two live trades on the call (ARM on a VWAP reclaim to a new high, MU into the pre-earnings run), walked through NTAP as today's preferred setup, and used NBIS as the central teaching example — clean setups matter more than the ticker. Overhead supply will chop you out.
Monday's read: RSP is flat against the 100-day — breadth is narrowing and the old leaders are stalled. But the trade is still on. The rule is the rule: trade leaders at new highs, not cheap laggards with overhead supply. Leaders are expensive because they are strong — institutional support, clean bases, institutional accumulation. Cheap stocks are cheap for a reason. They're stuck below the 200-day, in a downtrend, with overhead supply. Volume is coming in on some of them, but is it a leader? Not really. It doesn't act like one.
The two live trades on the call were the proof: ARM hit a new high on a VWAP reclaim, target $303, hit $310+ before close. MU pushed above the $1,040 level into the pre-earnings window, $1,017 invalidation, hold for the run. And NTAP — Matt's preferred setup for the day — is grinding higher with institutions accumulating, only 5% from the highs. The setup you want is the one with the clean base above the 200-day, putting in contraction, then breaking. When it breaks, it breaks and it goes.
Toppy tape — RSP flat against the 100-day, breadth narrowing — but the trade is still on. Trade leaders at new highs, not cheap stocks. Matt executed two live trades on the discipline (ARM on VWAP reclaim to $310+, MU above $1,040 into pre-earnings), and walked NTAP through as today's preferred setup — 5% from highs, institutions accumulating. NBIS is the lesson: clean setups matter more than the ticker. The overhead supply there will chop you out unless it breaks $233 first. Macro is two-out-of-three friendly (oil down, dollar up; yields ticking up is the one to watch). Leaders are strong. Cheap is cheap for a reason. Trade the leaders, skip the cheaps.
Live on the call: starter position on a VWAP reclaim to a new high. $297 entry on the reclaim, $286 stop (below the swing low), target the prior high at $303 — hit $303, then pushed to $310+ on the same session. Textbook Stage 2 breakout from a base above the 200-day line. The pattern: institutional accumulation into contraction, then the trigger.
Live on the call: pushed above the $1,040 level — exactly what we want to see before earnings. Stop $1,017 (the day's low), target the prior high zone. The thesis is the historical pattern: memory names run into earnings, then the print decides. Above $1,040 is the entry zone. Hold for the run.
Matt's preferred setup for Monday. Beautiful post-earnings consolidation, grinding higher, putting in contraction — the price action that means institutions are accumulating. Only 5% from the highs. The patient trade: wait for the trigger, don't pre-empt the move. Same Stage 2 discipline as ARM, just earlier in the base.
Way better setup than most names — still above the 200-day line, still in price contraction. But there's a lot of overhead supply. Needs $233 break first, or this chops you out. The rule: clean setups matter more than the ticker. The chart has to prove it before you act.
Buy alert fired on the call and Matt went with it. The setup spoke for itself — the trigger was the trigger, the position sizing was the position sizing. No need to overthink when the chart is doing the work. Live execution, live result.
SanDisk is doing what it's supposed to do — build a base above the current zone, working toward the next range. Next resistance at $2,000. The memory cohort (MU, SK Hynix, SanDisk) is the signal: a coordinated move higher across all three is the bullish confirmation. Pulling back slightly on Hynix is normal — the group has to move together.
Entry triggered at $155, target $195. The setup worked the way the setups are supposed to work — clean trigger, clear invalidation, written-down thesis. Hold for the move, manage the stop, let the trade develop. Patient trade.
Hit $600 today, but the chart is the counter-example for the day. Still in a downtrend, still below the 200-day line. Volume is coming in, but is it a leader? Not really. It doesn't act like one. Plenty of better setups out there — buy strength, not laggards. The cheap stocks are cheap for a reason.
The macro theme is the same one Matt has been hammering for weeks: trade leaders at new highs, not cheap stocks. Cheap stocks are cheap for a reason. They're stuck below the 200-day, in a downtrend, with overhead supply. Volume is coming in on some — but is it a leader? Not really. Leaders trade at new highs because they're strong, not because they're expensive. The two live trades on the call were the proof: ARM on VWAP reclaim to $310+, MU above $1,040 into pre-earnings. The setups that work look like NTAP — base above 200-day, contraction in price action, institutions accumulating, then the trigger. When it breaks, it breaks and it goes.
The central teaching moment of the call: NBIS is "way better" than most names — still above the 200-day, still in contraction — but there's a lot of overhead supply. Unless it's got fantastic news that it can just rip through and go, this is going to chop. The $233 break is the gate. Wait for the clean break before you act. The counter-example in the other direction: a name hitting $600 but still below the 200-day, still in a downtrend, volume coming in but not a leader. Cheap for a reason. Don't buy laggards just because they're moving.
"Trade leaders at new highs, not cheap stocks." The leaders are strong because they have institutional support — they don't get to new highs by accident. Cheap stocks are cheap for a reason: overhead supply, downtrend, no accumulation. Volume is coming in on some of them, but is it a leader? Not really. It doesn't act like one.
The clean setup rule is the second half of the lesson: "prioritize clean setups with no overhead supply." The chart that has to prove itself first is the chart that doesn't. NBIS is a textbook example — good name, good structure, but overhead supply will chop you out unless it breaks $233 first. The trade waits for the trigger, not the hope.
Risk lives in the setup, not the size: "you mitigate that by understanding the setups and really sort of following" the rules — pre-vet the names, write down the trigger, write down the invalidation, then act. The two live trades on the call (ARM $297→$310+, MU above $1,040) both followed the discipline. Leaders are strong. Cheap is cheap for a reason. Trade the leaders, skip the cheaps.